Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(22)2022 Nov 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2116210

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients are prone to thrombotic complications that may increase morbidity and mortality. These complications are thought to be driven by endothelial activation and tissue damage promoted by the systemic hyperinflammation associated with COVID-19. However, the exact mechanisms contributing to these complications are still unknown. To identify additional mechanisms contributing to the aberrant clotting observed in COVID-19 patients, we analyzed platelets from COVID-19 patients compared to those from controls using mass spectrometry. We identified increased serum amyloid A (SAA) levels, an acute-phase protein, on COVID-19 patients' platelets. In addition, using an in vitro adhesion assay, we showed that healthy platelets adhered more strongly to wells coated with COVID-19 patient serum than to wells coated with control serum. Furthermore, inhibitors of integrin aIIbß3 receptors, a mediator of platelet-SAA binding, reduced platelet adhesion to recombinant SAA and to wells coated with COVID-19 patient serum. Our results suggest that SAA may contribute to the increased platelet adhesion observed in serum from COVID-19 patients. Thus, reducing SAA levels by decreasing inflammation or inhibiting SAA platelet-binding activity might be a valid approach to abrogate COVID-19-associated thrombotic complications.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trombosis , Humanos , Proteína Amiloide A Sérica/metabolismo , COVID-19/complicaciones , Adhesividad Plaquetaria , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/metabolismo , Integrinas/metabolismo , Adherencias Tisulares
2.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 12703, 2021 06 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1275958

RESUMEN

Secondary bacterial infections are a potentially fatal complication of influenza infection. We aimed to define the impact of secondary bacterial infections on the clinical course and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients by comparison with influenza patients. COVID-19 (n = 642) and influenza (n = 742) patients, admitted to a large tertiary center in Israel and for whom blood or sputum culture had been taken were selected for this study. Bacterial culture results, clinical parameters, and death rates were compared. COVID-19 patients had higher rates of bacterial infections than influenza patients (12.6% vs. 8.7%). Notably, the time from admission to bacterial growth was longer in COVID-19 compared to influenza patients (4 (1-8) vs. 1 (1-3) days). Late infections (> 48 h after admission) with gram-positive bacteria were more common in COVID-19 patients (28% vs. 9.5%). Secondary infection was associated with a higher risk of death in both patient groups 2.7-fold (1.22-5.83) for COVID-19, and 3.09-fold (1.11-7.38) for Influenza). The association with death remained significant upon adjustment to age and clinical parameters in COVID-19 but not in influenza infection. Secondary bacterial infection is a notable complication associated with worse outcomes in COVID-19 than influenza patients. Careful surveillance and prompt antibiotic treatment may benefit selected patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , Coinfección/epidemiología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/mortalidad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/virología , Coinfección/microbiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Gripe Humana/virología , Israel/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(6): 917.e1-917.e4, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1155453

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of remdesivir, a Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been repeatedly questioned during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most of the recently reported studies were randomized controlled multicentre clinical trials. Our goal was to test the efficiency of remdesivir in reducing nasopharyngeal viral load and hospitalization length in a real-life setting in patients admitted to a large tertiary centre in Israel. METHODS: A total of 142 COVID-19 patients found to have at least three reported SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR tests during hospitalization were selected for this study. Of these, 29 patients received remdesivir, while the remaining non-treated 113 patients served as controls. RESULTS: Among the tested parameters, the control and remdesivir groups differed significantly only in the intubation rates. Remdesivir treatment did not significantly affect nasopharyngeal viral load, as determined by comparing the differences between the first and last cycle threshold values of the SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR tests performed during hospitalization (cycle threshold 7.07 ± 6.85 vs. 7.08 ± 7.27, p 0.977 in the control and treated groups, respectively). Remdesivir treatment shortened hospitalization length by less than a day compared with non-treated controls and by 3.1 days when non-intubated patients from both groups were compared. These differences, however, were not statistically significant, possibly because of the small size of the remdesivir group. DISCUSSION: Remdesivir was not associated with nasopharyngeal viral load changes, but our study had a significant disease severity baseline imbalance and was not powered to detect viral load or clinical differences.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de los fármacos , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nasofaringe/virología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos
4.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(7): 2902-2906, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-979671

RESUMEN

Metamizole is commonly used as analgesic and antipyretic drug. The use of metamizole is prohibited in several countries due to its rare side effect of neutropenia and even agranulocytosis. Among the many symptoms of COVID-19, fever and diffuse pain predominant and therefore it can be assumed that metamizole may be widely used in the current epidemic period. So far, there have been no reports on the safety of metamizole in COVID-19 patients. We describe a series of 3 patients who developed severe neutropenia under metamizole treatment, raising a concern of a possible increased risk of this side effect among COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neutropenia , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Dipirona/efectos adversos , Humanos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA